j
k
j a
j l
On 30.01.13 18:23, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
.........TypeFlag.HAS_GC | TypeFlag.INT_SUBCLASS 6
......TypeFlag.HAS_GC | TypeFlag.INT_SUBCLASS 6
...TypeFlag.HAS_GC | TypeFlag.INT_SUBCLASS 6
TypeFlag.HAS_GC | TypeFlag.INT_SUBCLASS 6
I prefer something like
......TypeFlag.HAS_GC | TypeFlag.INT_SUBCLASS TypeFlag.HAS_GC|INT_SUBCLASS
...TypeFlag.HAS_GC | TypeFlag.INT_SUBCLASS TypeFlag.HAS_GC|INT_SUBCLASS
TypeFlag.HAS_GC | TypeFlag.INT_SUBCLASS TypeFlag.HAS_GC|INT_SUBCLASS
Back to the thread
Back to the list