On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Steven D'Aprano email@example.com wrote:
On Thu, 16 Apr 2009 05:19:05 am George Sakkis wrote:
I think it would be counter-intuitive and error-prone if min(iterable, default=0) was different from min(*iterable, default=0), so I'd say no on the first one.
That's already the case.
min( iter() )
min( *iter() )
Traceback (most recent call last): File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> TypeError: 'int' object is not iterable
Oh right, posted too fast; the single argument case is already special, so we might as well make the zero arg case special.