I don't see how that would be
improved by a special syntax for the LHS to know the
identifier it's being assigned to. Could you clarify that?
I wasn't referring to labels here although somebody might find that
I was referring to the issue that fields don't know neither their
containing form classes nor their form instances. In some
circumstances, one need to do that in order to correctly work with
the field (think of the prefix of the form which needs to be
reflected in the field but there are more missing pieces of
As mentioned to Steven, in this case the name does not suffices at
all. So, I am not sure how to handle this right now. This might
belong to a greater issue of referring back which currently
needs to be handled manually in all cases.