18 Mar
2014
18 Mar
'14
12:58 a.m.
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:35:37AM +0000, Robert Kern wrote:
On 2014-03-17 05:03, Nick Coghlan wrote:
There are plenty of existing left-associative operators that could be used for that if Mike Bayer wanted (or could be convinced) to do so, so I don't see how that observation is relevant to the question of whether or not this particular proposal should be for a right-associative operator.
Although this does suggest that having a right-associative operator might provide some useful variety in the operator-overloading-as-DSL ecosystem.
That's a good point. That suggests that adding a second right-associative operator may be a good idea even if it's not necessary for numpy. -- Steven