30 Aug
2016
30 Aug
'16
10:23 p.m.
On Aug 30, 2016, at 02:16 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Given that something like this gets proposed from time to time, I wonder if it would make sense to actually write up (1) and (2) as a PEP that is immediately marked rejected. The PEP should make it clear *why* it is rejected. This would be a handy reference doc to have around the next time the idea comes up.
There certainly is precedence: e.g. PEPs 404 and 666. :) Cheers, -Barry