6 Apr
2014
6 Apr
'14
4:34 p.m.
On Apr 6, 2014 4:39 AM, "Nick Coghlan" <ncoghlan@gmail.com> wrote:
There *is* a connection here: this needs to play nice with the ordered kwargs in order to handle the pass-through case correctly.
The guarantee that the order of the supplied mapping (minus any entries that map to named parameters) will be preserved needs to be made explicit.
You're right. It's already implied by OrderedDict. However the point *should* be explicit. -eric