9 Oct
2012
9 Oct
'12
7:24 p.m.
Am 08.10.2012 20:47, schrieb Antoine Pitrou:
Hello,
Since there has been some controversy about the joining syntax used in PEP 428 (filesystem path objects), I would like to run an informal poll about it. Please answer with +1/+0/-0/-1 for each proposal:
- `p[q]` joins path q to path p
+0
- `p + q` joins path q to path p
-1
- `p / q` joins path q to path p
+1
- `p.join(q)` joins path q to path p
-0 +0 for .joinpath() as the only way, +1 for .joinpath() as an alternative. Georg