July 5, 2010
4:11 p.m.
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 00:30, M.-A. Lemburg <mal@egenix.com> wrote: [SNIP]
Aside 1: Isn't it interesting that the more we actually think about moving to Mercurial, the more we find that the existing Subversion model of working is actually a very workable model for a large open source project ?!
Not really. The current system works and is understood without retraining. The switch to hg has never been about tweaking the workflow of committers, but that of contributors.