23 Nov
2010
23 Nov
'10
9:48 p.m.
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:22:13 +0000 (UTC)
Ram Rachum
By the way, "Unpickleable" doesn't work since it's ambiguous: you don't know whether it means you can unpickle the thing, or you can't pickle it.
Regards
Antoine.
Sorry, I didn't explain well enough: I meant that only inherently unpickleable objects, like files and locks, will be instances of `Unpickleable`. So if we have a list containing a file or a lock, it will still be an instance of `Pickleable`, as well as an object which refers to a file/lock as an attribute.
Maybe this is a good case for having only the negative `Unpickleable` and not the positive `Pickleable`.
Read what I said above about the ambiguity of the name, though.