March 18, 2009
2:47 a.m.
Greg Ewing wrote:
Mark Dickinson wrote:
format('%014f', 123.456, grouping=1)
'0,000,123.456000'
That also means that the relationship between the field width (14 in this case) and the string length (16) is somewhat obscured.
I'd consider that part a bug that we shouldn't imitate. The field width should always be what you say it is, unless the value is too big to fit.
Should there be an option for using hard-width? If hard-width flag is on, then if the value is too big to fit, then the number will get trimmed instead of changing the width (and perhaps there would be prepend character). So: width: 4, number: 123456, ppchar "<456" So not to break table alignment...