On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 10:05 AM, Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 04:06:51AM +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 3:59 AM, Neil Girdhar <mistersheik@gmail.com> wrote:
This example shows additional flexibility:
z = {a: transformed_b for b in bs given transformed_b = transform(b) for a in as_}
There is no nice, equivalent := version as far as I can tell.
True. However, it took me several readings to understand what you were doing here.
Possibly you shouldn't have tried reading at 4am.
Either that or I shouldn't be reading before I've had a coffee :-)
Have I missed something that you have seen?
Yep, as mentioned in the other post. The fact that you talk like this about it - asserting that it's obvious what this does, while still considering it to be utterly useless - is proof, IMO, that this should be frowned upon in style guides. ChrisA