On 2016-09-06 7:19 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Yury Selivanov firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
On 2016-09-04 3:10 AM, Adam Bartoš wrote:
will await be allowed also in the "if" part of comprehensions? And what about the "in" part? (e.g. if I'm not mistaken, we may have an asynchronous function returning an asynchronous iterator.)
Yes, awaits will be allowed. I'll update the PEP.
Hasn't happened yet... I see this PEP as written in a bit of haste and very close to the 3.6b1 feature freeze (coming weekend). Usually I wouldn't accept such a hasty PEP, but the ideas in it seem pretty uncontroversial, and in line with the existing expectations for async/await.
Yury, if you manage to get a working implementation signed off by one other core dev (not me) I can accept the PEP provisionally, under the same conditions as PEP 525.
Thank you for accepting the PEP! Will focus on the implementation now.