On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 06:53:35PM +0300, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
> I also forgot to mention very important point in the intro: when you
> read this proposal, please don't think about "CPython". That for sure
> will send you the wrong vibes. Think about "Python". ;-)
I never think *only* of CPython when reading PEPs. Unless the PEP is
clearly and obviously about an implementation detail of CPython, I
always read them as proposing a *Python* language change. Doesn't
But I don't understand your comment. Are you suggesting that CPython
will be exempt from this proposal? Or that the proposal is aimed at
helping alternative implementations?
Should we be thinking specifically of some alternate implementation? If
not, then the purpose of this "very important point" isn't clear to me.
Python-ideas mailing list -- email@example.com
To unsubscribe send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org
Message archived at https://email@example.com/message/SM2CSWUKTEAT667USVUSLFMRVRSYPA4K/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/