12 Mar
2015
12 Mar
'15
3:58 p.m.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015, at 11:51, random832@fastmail.us wrote:
It does not forbid any processing from being done "in exec" (i.e. in execve).
Just for completeness, I will note that it _probably_ does forbid exec from returning [ENOENT], [EACCES], etc, on the basis of problems executing the interpreter specified in the shbang line, and implementations should simply return [EINVAL] in that case. However, that's quite different from the processing being forbidden entirely.