On 14.08.2013 11:17, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Le Wed, 14 Aug 2013 11:03:36 +0200, "M.-A. Lemburg" <mal@egenix.com> a écrit :
Note that this does not necessarily mean that all code going into the core has to be subject to a CLA. It is still possible to integrate code which has a license compatible with the PSF license, but in general, we'd like to avoid the extra work of having to check and verify such licenses.
Is it possible to "check and verify", say, the common form of the (ultra-simple) MIT license (*)? That would make it a safe starting point for contributors.
The "check and verify" step would have to be done on a case-by-case basis. We would need to make sure that the the copyright holders mentioned in the license are in fact the copyright holders, check that the license doesn't prevent the PSF from modifying the PSF license to address future concerns and also pay close attention to things like patents. The CLA makes this a lot easier for the PSF and everyone invovled, which is why we have it :-) But we're getting off-topic here. Such things should be discussed on the python-legal list: http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-legal-sig -- Marc-Andre Lemburg eGenix.com Professional Python Services directly from the Source (#1, Aug 14 2013)
Python Projects, Consulting and Support ... http://www.egenix.com/ mxODBC.Zope/Plone.Database.Adapter ... http://zope.egenix.com/ mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ... http://python.egenix.com/
::::: Try our mxODBC.Connect Python Database Interface for free ! :::::: eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH Pastor-Loeh-Str.48 D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611 http://www.egenix.com/company/contact/