On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 6:18 AM Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I've just updated PEP 671 https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0671/
> with some additional information about the reference implementation,
> and some clarifications elsewhere.
>
> *PEP 671: Syntax for late-bound function argument defaults*
>
> Questions, for you all:
>
> 1) If this feature existed in Python 3.11 exactly as described, would
> you use it?
I would actively avoid using this feature and discourage people from
using it because:
> 2) Independently: Is the syntactic distinction between "=" and "=>" a
> cognitive burden?
I think that this imposes a significant cognitive burden, not for the
simple cases, but when combined with the more advanced function
definition syntax. I think this has the potential to make debugging
large code-bases much harder.
There is nothing that this proposal makes possible that is not already
possible with more explicit code.
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python...@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-id...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python...@python.org/message/3WSRN5NMENAPEUAYQPZCKUW2G43PNJM7/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/