On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 9:15 PM, Robert Collins <robertc@robertcollins.net> wrote:
On 25 April 2015 at 16:02, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> wrote:

> While it's a less significant behavioural difference than being a
> generator function, a non-empty closure could conceivably also be
> reported in the repr():
>     <function foo at 0x7f7dad9f7bf8 (closure)>
>     <function foo at 0x7f7dad9f7bf8 (closure,generator)>

I like this suggestion. Doing it for the await changes as well would be great.


Robert Collins <rbtcollins@hp.com>
Distinguished Technologist
HP Converged Cloud
Python-ideas mailing list
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)