Agreed. Would be wonderful! On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Andrew Svetlov <andrew.svetlov@gmail.com> wrote:
Probably will try to make a patch this weekend. Changing behavior of *next* command looks more convenient for end user.
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 1:53 AM, Andrew Svetlov <andrew.svetlov@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> wrote:
In the past, when I was debugging NDB, I've asked in vain whether someone had already made the necessary changes to pdb to let it jump over a yield instead of following it -- I may have to go in and develop a change myself, because this problem isn't going away.
Do you want new pdb command or change behavior of *step* or *next*?
Good question. If it's easier I'd be okay with a new command; but changing the behavior of "next" would also work, if it's possible. Are you interested in working on an implementation? I'd be interested in reviewing it then.
-- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
-- Thanks, Andrew Svetlov
-- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)