April 26, 2017
10:28 p.m.
On 26 April 2017 at 22:42, Erik <python@lucidity.plus.com> wrote:
2) The original proposal, which does belong on -ideas and has to take into account the general case, not just my specific use-case.
The post you are responding to is part of (2), and hence reduced performance is a consideration.
Ah, OK. I'm discounting the original proposal, as there don't seem to be sufficient (i.e., any :-)) actual use cases that aren't covered by the decorator proposal(s). Or to put it another way, if the only reason for the syntax proposal is performance then show me a case where performance is so critical that it warrants a language change. Sorry for not being clear myself. Paul