I would say here are two more things to consider:
(1) How to colorize expression @a or b and c? My IDE colorizes only @a as decorator
(2) How to search for all functions that have been applied decorator `b` (*not* either `a` or `b`)?
(bonus) How to test expression of the above form? By definition, you will have only *one* function decorated like that. To test it, you should define it as a separate function anyway.
ilya.
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Georg Brandlg.brandl@gmx.net wrote:
MRAB schrieb:
I do see a reason. I have no problems with
@foo.bar @foo.bar[baz] @foo.bar(baz)
But this is ugly to me:
@a + b def foo(): pass
Ugly, yes.
As is this:
@a or (c and d) def foo(): pass
Agreed.
Good :)
Having the decorator expression "opened" by @ but not "closed" feels bad.
But:
@foo
isn't "closed" either.
Hmm, the above is probably a bad expression of my "feeling" :) but I think you know what I mean.
Georg
-- Thus spake the Lord: Thou shalt indent with four spaces. No more, no less. Four shall be the number of spaces thou shalt indent, and the number of thy indenting shall be four. Eight shalt thou not indent, nor either indent thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to four. Tabs are right out.
Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas