
Feb. 11, 2021
9:37 a.m.
I think it is probably pointless now, but you might get more response if you post actual examples of the syntax and semantics, explaining how your proposal differs from the (now accepted) alternative, and why you made the choices you did. You should also consider that pattern matching is built on software patterns that are proven to actually be used. People *actually do* write code based on isinstance matches, tuple unpacking, etc., so it seems strange to want to avoid those patterns. But honestly, the window of opportunity has probably closed. -- Steve