14 Apr
2017
14 Apr
'17
9:09 a.m.
On 14 April 2017 at 04:20, Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> wrote:
Long ago, when the operator module was first introduced, there was a much stronger correspondence between the operator.__dunder__ functions and dunder methods. But I think that correspondence is now so weak that we should simply treat it as a historical artifact.
+1 from me, with this rationale. The specifics sounds pretty good to me, too - happy to review a PR if you put one together :) Cheers, Nick. P.S. To be completely honest, I'd forgotten the dunder names in operator were there :) -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia