On 29 April 2010 12:22, cool-RR <cool-rr@cool-rr.com> wrote:
Yes, I'm aware the implementation is simple. I was not asking for an implementation. I was just raising the idea that it should be part of the builtin `reversed`. But since there are no +1s, I guess not.
Sorry. My point was that the gains (in terms of the difficulty of implementing it yourself) are minor, so the cost doesn't justify it. Specifically, the costs are (1) extra complexity when describing the behaviour of reversed() and (2) more seriously, potential crashes if an infinite generator (for example) is passed to reversed() in error. Currently, reversed(infinite_gen) is a trappable error. With your proposal, it would halt the program until all memory was consumed, then crash. Anyone using a custom function such as my reversed_anything can be assumed to understand its limitations, whereas builtins can be assumed to behave "nicely". Looking at it the other way, it's easy to build reversed_anything given reversed, but it's not possible to build reversed given only reversed_anything. The builtin function should be the one that can be more easily used to build from. My apologies for being too terse. Paul.