j: Next unread message
k: Previous unread message
j a: Jump to all threads
j l: Jump to MailingList overview
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Andre Roberge email@example.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Chris Rebert firstname.lastname@example.org wrote: [snip]
The other somewhat popular choices of assignment syntax that I've seen are x := y, x <- y, and let x = y. The first and last of those still use a =, albeit with something extra, and so aren't too much of a stretch. x <- y is particularly deviant and isn't readable (as in read it out loud) IMHO; you either have to read it right-to-left (which is unnatural) as "Take y and put it into x", or as "x has y placed into it" (which uses the passive voice and so does not fit well with an imperative language.
Furthermore, the "take y and put it into x" might be an appropriate interpretation for C but not for Python. For Python it should be instead something like "Assign the name x to object y" which could be visually represented by x -> y instead of x <- y as you mention.
Indeed. Of course, I think that commits the equally cardinal sin of flipping the direction of the assignment operator, from variable-value to value-variable. :)
-- Follow the path of the Iguana... http://rebertia.com