On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> wrote:
On 16 March 2014 22:26, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis@pitrou.net> wrote:
On Sun, 16 Mar 2014 12:57:06 +1000 Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> wrote:
Guido has asked them to have that discussion and summarise their conclusions in the PEP - we can lob our armchair opinions into the mix after the experts have spoken.
Debunking armchair opinions is one of the points of the PEP process :-)
Aye, but at the moment it makes sense to wait and see if there is even an argument to be had - Nathaniel may decide that even after reviewing the question seriously, he doesn't want to propose a right associative operator :)
And indeed, that does seem to be the way things have worked out :-). http://mail.scipy.org/pipermail/numpy-discussion/2014-April/069834.html -- Nathaniel J. Smith Postdoctoral researcher - Informatics - University of Edinburgh http://vorpus.org