Since .next() seems to be equivalent to .send(None), why wasn't .next() just given an optional parameter which defaults to None?
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Simon Forman email@example.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Andrey Fedorov firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
As far as I can tell, a generator's .next() is equivalent to .send(None).
They are equivalent AFAIK.
If so, [why] aren't they unified in a method with a single argument which
next() predates send().