![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/72ee673975357d43d79069ac1cd6abda.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
June 27, 2019
10:25 p.m.
Yanghao Hua wrote:
this one, on the other hand, is truly generic and universal.
The problem is that it's *too* universal. A __getself__ method would be a sorcerer's-apprentice kind of magic that you can't escape when you don't want it. Suppose you want to inspect an object for debugging purposes. If it has a __getself__ method that returns something other than itself, it would be impossible to even look at it without it morphing into something else.
Isn't the top level itself a namespace? isn't every function local itself a namespace?
Yes, but namespace-based magic is confined to the namespace you define it on. The proposed object-based magic would be completely inescapable. -- Greg