Hi Philippe,
Thanks for preparing the PEP! I also think it will improve the readability
a lot in code that heavily uses type annotations.
I'd suggest you to split this PEP in two: one for Union types and another
one for Optional. It will facilitate the discussions and reaching consensus
since these are actually two separate issues. For example, I endorse the
proposal for "|" operator, while I have some reservations about "~" (e.g.,
~~x is expected to be x?).
I'm not a core developer, though, so maybe they prefer joint PEPs rather
than seperate ones.
Cheers,
Marko
Le mar. 17 sept. 2019 à 08:56, Philippe Prados
Hello,
I would like to publish a new PEP (see here https://github.com/pprados/peps/blob/master/pep-9999.rst). I discussed this idea here https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/thread/FCTXGDT... . The PEP1 https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0001/ explains that I must have a sponsor.
Who can help me ?
Thanks
Philippe Prados _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-leave@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/WWSOVK... Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/