You actually can get a syntax like that without macros, using stack-introspection, locals-trickery and lots of `eval`. The question is whether you consider macros more "extreme" than stack-introspection, locals-trickery and `eval`! A JIT compiler will probably be much happier with macros.
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Terry Jan Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> wrote:
On 4/23/2013 11:49 PM, Haoyi Li wrote:
I thought this may be of interest to some people on this list, even ifI'm working on MacroPy <https://github.com/lihaoyi/macropy>, a little
not strictly an "idea".
pure-python library that allows user-defined AST rewrites as part of the
import process (using PEP 302).
From the readme
'''
String Interpolation
a, b = 1, 2
c = s%"%{a} apple and %{b} bananas"
print c
#1 apple and 2 bananas
'''
I am a little surprised that you would base a cutting edge extension on Py 2. Do you have it working with 3.3 also?
'''Unlike the normal string interpolation in Python, MacroPy's string interpolation allows the programmer to specify the variables to be interpolated inline inside the string.'''
Not true as I read that.
a, b = 1, 2
print("{a} apple and {b} bananas".format(**locals()))
print("%(a)s apple and %(b)s bananas" % locals())
#1 apple and 2 bananas
#1 apple and 2 bananas
I rather like the anon funcs with anon params. That only works when each param is only used once in the expression, but that restriction is the normal case.
I am interested to see what you do with pattern matching.
tjr
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas