I love moredots ❤️

With pip install funcoperators, one can implement the *dotmul* iff dotmul can be implemented as a function.

L *dotmul* 1

Would work.

Or even a simple tweak to the library would allow L *dot* s to be [x*s for x in L] and L /dot/ s to be [x/s for x in L]"

I'd implement something like "if left is iterable and right is not, apply [x*y for x in left] else if both are iterable, apply [x*y for x,y in zip(left, right)] etc."

Iterble

Disclaimer : I'm the creator of funcoperators

On Fri, 1 Feb 2019, 00:23 Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 09:51:20AM -0800, Chris Barker via Python-ideas wrote:

> I do a lot of numerical programming, and used to use MATLAB and now numpy a
> lot. So I am very used to "vectorization" -- i.e. having operations that
> work on a whole collection of items at once.
[...]
> You can imagine that for more complex expressions the "vectorized" approach
> can make for much clearer and easier to parse code. Also much faster, which
> is what is usually talked about, but I think the readability is the bigger
> deal.

Julia has special "dot" vectorize operator that looks like this:

     L .+ 1   # adds 1 to each item in L

     func.(L)   # calls f on each item in L

https://julialang.org/blog/2017/01/moredots

The beauty of this is that you can apply it to any function or operator
and the compiler will automatically vectorize it. The function doesn't
have to be written to specifically support vectorization.


> So what does this have to do with the topic at hand?
>
> I know that when I'm used to working with numpy and then need to do some
> string processing or some such, I find myself missing this "vectorization"
> -- if I want to do the same operation on a whole bunch of strings, why do I
> need to write a loop or comprehension or map? that is:
>
> [s.lower() for s in a_list_of_strings]
>
> rather than:
>
> a_list_of_strings.lower()

Using Julia syntax, that might become a_list_of_strings..lower(). If you
don't like the double dot, perhaps str.lower.(a_list_of_strings) would
be less ugly.



--
Steven
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/