14 Oct
2012
14 Oct
'12
12:13 p.m.
Le dimanche 14 octobre 2012 à 14:04 +0200, Yuval Greenfield a écrit :
Steven realized what currently happens and was suggesting doing it differently.
Personally I really dislike the idea that
[i for i in p][0] != p[0]
It makes no sense to have this huge surprise.
Again, p[0] just raises TypeError. Regards Antoine.