data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eac55/eac5591fe952105aa6b0a522d87a8e612b813b5f" alt=""
On 9 January 2016 at 12:01, Victor Stinner <victor.stinner@gmail.com> wrote:
2016-01-09 2:38 GMT+01:00 Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>:
The discussion on python-ideas can benefit from PEP numbers too, particularly since you're putting three separate proposals up. ("Wait, I know I saw a comment about that. Oh right, that was in PEP 142857, not 142856.") But it's up to you.
Hum, I forgot to mention that I'm not 100% sure yet that I correctly splitted my work on the FAT Python project into the right number of PEPs. Maybe we could merge two PEPs, or a PEP should be splitted into sub-PEPs because it requires too many changes (I'm thinking at the third PEP, not published yet, it's still a "private" draft).
The first two proposals you've posted make sense to consider as standalone changes, so it seems reasonable to assign them PEP numbers now rather than waiting. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncoghlan@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia