On 03/23/2010 02:24 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
On second thought, maybe it would be better to optionally chain to the existing sys.excepthook instead of assuming it writes to stderr. The above code would become:
That looks just great. I understand you're leaving tomorrow, so I'll probably try converting it to C while you're away. I expect I should be able to find some time. I'll make an issue for it if you haven't already, and submit it for review there. I don't imagine it will be too hard, but I haven't really done any C API hacking at the level of creating an inner function. I should be able to figure it out though. Thanks, and have a good trip. Sean -- Sean Reifschneider, Member of Technical Staff <jafo@tummy.com> tummy.com, ltd. - Linux Consulting since 1995: Ask me about High Availability