On 02/04/2020 22:24, Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 21:25:46 -0400 Kyle Stanley<aeros167@gmail.com> wrote:
Roughly speaking, the answer would be about the same in idea as answers to the following questions: [snip] I would say the difference between this proposal so far and the ones
Paul Sokolovsky wrote: listed are that they emphasized concrete, real-world examples from Well, but those are "done" changes which were backed by official PEPs (except for unary+ which hopefully was there forever). While I kinda tried to flex my arms in what it would make to write a PEP-like text, it certainly nowhere there after me spending a couple of hours on it, and collecting more evidence would take more time.
I think you may misunderstand. Before they were "done" changes, the changes you listed (aside from unary +) justified being done by reference to concrete, real-world examples that would be improved by them. That's been lacking to the extent that it sounds like what you're really saying is "I want to program $LANGUAGE in Python." Since that's almost always a mistake, you've actually driven me from +0 to -0.5 on the subject! -- Rhodri James *-* Kynesim Ltd