14 Oct
2012
14 Oct
'12
7:55 p.m.
On 14/10/2012 11:45pm, Greg Ewing wrote:
It does indeed contradict me. It looks like this is implementation-dependent, because I distinctly remember encountering a bug once that I traced back to the fact that I wasn't servicing *all* the fds reported as ready before making another select call.
Could it have been that some fds were being starved because the earlier ones in the lists were getting priority? Servicing all fds reported prevents such starvation problems.
-- Richard