On 19.10.12 19:18, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Christian Tismer
wrote: On 19.10.12 18:07, Guido van Rossum wrote:
...
TBH, I am not interested in making very deep recursion work at all. If you need that, you're doing it wrong in my opinion. ... Agreed that new code like that would be bad style. Like "what"?
Like code that excercises deep recursion thoughtlessly ;-) in contrast to code that happens to be quite nested because of a systematic transformation. So correctness first, big Oh later. -- Christian Tismer :^) mailto:tismer@stackless.com Software Consulting : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 121 : *Starship* http://starship.python.net/ 14482 Potsdam : PGP key -> http://pgp.uni-mainz.de phone +49 173 24 18 776 fax +49 (30) 700143-0023 PGP 0x57F3BF04 9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619 305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04 whom do you want to sponsor today? http://www.stackless.com/