On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 11:18 PM, Stefano Borini < firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
On 9/24/14 10:38 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
"Upstream" is Giampaolo Rodola, who is a core developer.
I already sent him an email about this. I am waiting for his answer. I would enjoy handling the library as a maintainer in the stdlib, but I have never done anything at this level, so I am not sure I am worthy/able to do it ;)
Hello all and thanks for the positive feedback. It's good to know psutil is so appreciated and it's the best payback for all the hard work. Personally I would be glad to offer psutil for inclusion into the stdlib but at the moment I'm crazily busy with the relocation (I moved to Berlin from Italy) and I wouldn't really have time to dedicate to such an expensive task (which would probably also deserve a PEP) and careful thinking. Also, I still want to work on a couple of new features first (NIC addresses and stats), address a couple of high-priority issues such as: https://github.com/giampaolo/psutil/issues/512 https://github.com/giampaolo/psutil/issues/496 https://github.com/giampaolo/psutil/issues/428 ...and be 100% sure that I'm happy with the API as it is right now (I already went through a major breakage once, see http://grodola.blogspot.com/2014/01/psutil-20-porting.html). In summary, I'd love to do this but not right now as I'm not quite ready yet.