June 11, 2020
4:17 p.m.
On 2020-06-11 22:15, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 06/11/2020 01:18 PM, Rob Cliffe via Python-ideas wrote:
If the new super-duper all-singing-and-dancing-and-make-the-tea parser can cope with 'print' without parens, it can cope with print followed by nothing. Good addition to the proposal, actually. :-) (Repeated for clarity: I'm in favour of the proposition for 'print' only.)
If print
prints a blank line, how are you going to access the "print" function as an object?
Context: it's in a statement, on its own, just the name "print".
An academic question at this point as Guido has withdrawn the proposal.