On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Alexandre Vassalotti<alexandre@peadrop.com> wrote:
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Mark Dickinson<dickinsm@gmail.com> wrote:
You say that the 'primary purpose of the API is long serialization'. I'd argue that that's not quite true.
And you are totally right. [...]
Eh? But I came here for an argument! Isn't this room 12? A couple of other things: If these additions to int go in, then presumably the _PyLong_AsBytes and _PyLong_FromBytes functions should be documented and made public (and have their leading underscores removed, too). Those functions have been stable for a good while, and are well-used within the Python source; I think they're robust enough for public consumption. There may be some additional argument validation required; I'll take a look at this. In the issue tracker, Josiah Carlson asked about the possibility of backporting to 2.7. I can't see any problem with this, though there would be some small extra work involved in making things work for int as well as long. Does anyone else see any issues with this? Mark