On 30Oct2017 07:32, Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> wrote:
This is a key example of a case where code speaks. Can you write an implementation of how you would want single() to work in Python code?
Myself, I'm not advocating for putting such a thing in itertools. However, I do have an equivalent utility function of my own that makes for more readable code, named "the". It sees far less use than I'd imagined it would, but it does read nicely to my eye when used. I have a few select-something from data where there _can_ be multiple hits i.e. the data format/structure support multiple matching results, but the caller's use case requires just one hit or failure. So I have some fuzzy-db-lookup functions which end with: return the(rows) or include: row = the(rows) and some HTML find-this-DOM-node code which ends with: return the(nodes) It's this kind of thing that expresses my intent better than the: node, = nodes return node idiom. And as remarked, you can embed the() in an expression. I don't think it ranks in "belongs in the stdlib". I do keep it about in a module for ready use though. If nothing else, it raises IndexErrors with distinct text for 0 and >1 failure. Cheers, Cameron Simpson <cs@cskk.id.au> (formerly cs@zip.com.au)