If it’s curated by more experienced members of this mailing list I would feel more confident in depending on it and more keen to contribute and review PRs. Maybe, with luck, if some good robust solution arises, it could be streamlined to python core library, if deemed appropriate. It could provide some structure how to go forward with certain queries that end up in this mailing list and although potentially legit, do not progress due to lack of clarity of what to do next. More experienced members of this group could guide OPs and give feedback. If OP wants to do some R&D, what’s there to loose? If this was so, maybe by now we would be reviewing a potential PR with references to 3rd party solutions, shortcomings and proposed implementation with benchmarks. PR/Issue could have a check list. E.g. 1. What potential Python stdlib solutions have you found and how were they lacking? 2. What potential 3rd party solutions have you found and how were they lacking? What’s the worst that can happen?
On 1 Jul 2023, at 15:34, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 1 Jul 2023 at 22:32, Dom Grigonis <dom.grigonis@gmail.com> wrote:
Another idea, maybe this group could host a simple git repo.
This has the same problem of who is curating it. If it's uncurated, that's PyPI as it already is. If it's controlled by the PyPA or PSF, then it gives too much authority.
ChrisA _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-leave@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/6W7YUL... Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/