On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Tim Peters <tim.peters@gmail.com> wrote:
[Guido]
I propose a moratorium on language changes. This would be a period of several years during which no changes to Python's grammar or language semantics will be accepted.
Eh. I'll be a solid +1 on this /if/ you use your time machine to begin the moratorium right after the "with" statement was introduced. The rationale you gave applied as much then as it does now -- and if you do this, then we won't need to discuss it now, since it will already have been done.
Well, my intention is for it to begin right after 3.1 was released. While the time machine can do stuff with SVN or Hg branches, it's not powerful enough to mess with code already released. Though honestly I don't recall exactly what was added between the with statement and the 3.1 release apart from 'nonlocal'.
If you won't use your time machine, fine, +0.9. I'm taking off a tenth so you realize there's a steep cost for refusing it interfere with history.
Ah, you've moved from fractional winks to fractional votes. A nice upgrade. :-) -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)