![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d67ab5d94c2fed8ab6b727b62dc1b213.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
23 Oct
2021
23 Oct
'21
9:06 p.m.
On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 6:55 AM Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> wrote:
I like that you're trying to fix this wart! I think that using a different syntax may be the only way out. My own bikeshed color to try would be `=>`, assuming we'll introduce `(x) => x+1` as the new lambda syntax, but I can see problems with both as well :-).
Sounds good. I can definitely get behind this as the preferred syntax, until such time as we find a serious problem. ChrisA