On 14 Mar 2015 09:44, "Chris Barker" <chris.barker@noaa.gov> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Ryan Gonzalez <rymg19@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> That written in Python, so Python would require Python to build which would require Python to build which would require...
>
>
> Well, you can't buid a C compiler without a C compiler either (or SOME compiler). And given that you should be able to do cross-compilation for platforms that don't currently have a python build, I'm not sure that's a killer.
>
> It it so wrong that python eats its own dog food in this manner?

Wrong, no.  harder yes. C compilers have mature cross compiler build chains including stage aware test suites and the like. When a tool is it's own build dependency bootstrapping it on a new platform gains a hard requirement on cross compiling rather than it being a thing for special cases like platforms that cannot compile the tool. This makes the life of distribution maintainers harder too, since cross arch platform bootstrapping becomes even more manual.

Rob