May 28, 2012
4:34 p.m.
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> wrote:
Slightly easier bar to reach: could the various incarnations be improved by using a new varobject type as a base class (e.g. I know I often use namedtuple as a base class rather than instantiating them directly, although I do the latter, too).
Good point. I do the same.
There's also a potentially less controversial alternative: just add an easy spelling for "type(name, (), {})" to the C API.
I really like this. There's a lot of boilerplate to create just a simple type like this in the C API. I'll see what I can come up with. :) As a namespace, it would be good to have a nice repr, but that's not a show stopper. -eric