[Python-ideas] Re: An alternative way of defining properties (warning: contains creative abuse of the class statement)

On 2/07/20 8:04 pm, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:

It has a problem with pickling (it is solvable).

Can you elaborate? The end result is a property object just the same as you would get from using @property or calling property directly. I don't see how it can have any pickling problems beyond what properties already have.

The larger problem is with using private (double underscored) variables and super().

I don't know what you're talking about here. I didn't use any double-underscore names in my example. -- Greg