On 2016-10-12 22:46, Mikhail V wrote:
For numbers obviously you don't need so many character as for speech encoding, so this means that only those glyphs or even a subset of it should be used. This means anything more than 8 characters is quite worthless for reading numbers. Note that I can't provide here the works currently so don't ask me for that. Some of them would be probably available in near future.
It's pretty clear to me by this point that your argument has no rational basis, so I'm regarding this thread as a dead end.