On 10/17/2013 04:59 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 10/17/2013 1:58 PM, Ron Adam wrote:
On 10/16/2013 08:13 PM, Andrew Barnert wrote:
On Oct 15, 2013, at 23:21, Ron Adam<ron3200@gmail.com> wrote:
A little digression...
I've been thinking that pythons byte code could be a little higher level and still be efficient. So I wrote a little interpreter (in python) to test some ideas.
If you are not familiar with http://code.google.com/p/wpython2/ "A wordcode-based Python implementation" you might find it interesting.
Thanks, that looks interesting, I hadn't seen it before. I glanced over the following... http://wpython2.googlecode.com/files/Cleanup%20and%20new%20optimizations%20i... I'm looking for a path that will also lead to creating stand alone executables easily. This is a taste of that ... https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/clojure/CsGhwc3oyUQ I'm not sure how difficult it will be, but it looks interesting. Note that they talk about outputting scheme code... clojure is very near scheme, so that's not surprising. Python outputs byte_code which is a bit harder to convert. We might be able to improve that part of it. Cheers, Ron