
On 1/30/2013 2:26 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:58:37 +1300 Greg Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:
Guido van Rossum wrote:
class color(enum): RED = value() WHITE = value() BLUE = value()
We could do somewhat better than that:
class Color(Enum): RED, WHITE, BLUE = range(3)
However, it's still slightly annoying that you have to specify how many values there are in the range() call.
For small enumerations, not much of a problem. Or, if one does not want to take the time to count, allow RED, WHITE, BLUE, _extras = range(12) # any number >= n and have a metaclass delete _extras.
Well, how about:
class Color(Enum): values = ('RED', 'WHITE', 'BLUE') ? (replace values with __values__ if you prefer)
I had the same idea, and having never written a metaclass that I can remember, decided to try it. class EnumMeta(type): def __new__(cls, name, bases, dic): for i, name in enumerate(dic['_values']): dic[name] = i del dic['_values'] return type.__new__(cls, name, bases, dic) class Enum(metaclass=EnumMeta): _values = () class Color(Enum): _values = 'RED', 'GREEN', 'BLUE' print(Color.RED, Color.GREEN, Color.BLUE)
0 1 2
So this syntax is at least feasible -- today. -- Terry Jan Reedy