10 Nov
2011
10 Nov
'11
6:30 a.m.
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 10:24:18 +1000
Nick Coghlan
It seems to me that "implementation name" would work as a term for Antoine's PEP as well, since it's about providing enough information to locate the actual implementation of the class or function relative to the top level of the module.
I don't really follow this reasoning. There is no other object than the "actual implementation"; __name__ and __q[ual]name__ denote the same thing. "Implementation name" sounds like a misnomer to me. If __qname__ is too elliptic, let's settle on __qualname__? Regards Antoine.